• Johnston backs praises response of Lib Dem MEP Watson August 31, 2010
    Paul Johnston, a leading Aberdeenshire Councillor has welcomed the link between the Pakistan floods to climate change and the need for the UK to tackle it in a more co-ordinated manner. “In much of the coverage of the tragedy that is Pakistan at the moment it is hard to make the connection to the UK.  Its […]
------News-------

Unversity - the life chances of fewer in a failing state.

Comment

Today has seen the rather depressing announcement on higher education funding in England. Depressing as it may not only spoil the lives of so many fellow citizens in another of our nations in these islands, but i might also lend support for similar ignorance to spread to our Scottish Bürgermeisters.

The argument that Peter Mandelson makes is that because of financial matters of government borrowing, we, as a State, will shift the responsibility for the investment to the individual. The admission is that there will be less students, shorter courses, more focussed on the now and not the future. Its a matter of personal choice and not political and governmental imperative.

I posted this video a while back in an older version. Its worth viewing again – an updated version.

The debate is not who pays Mr Mandelson, but how we all have to come to terms with what is happening. Its going to be the greatest sign of a failed state, hat one gives up one’s future for the present.

There are massive arguments abut whether Mr Mandelson even understands the need of higher education. Its not there for industry, its there for humanity. Its not there for just personal benefit as if the student was a mere consumer, its there for the total knowledge and scholarship of all. Its there because we are civilized and we are contributing to its future.

Its worth returning to the issue of Higher Education a la the noble Lord Mandelson. But watch this first.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Paul's Blog

  • Exams and Scottish Higher Education
    August 5, 2010 | 7:21 pm

    On the day that Scottish Exam results drop through the letterboxes of expecting students, there remains the unresolved debate about the future of higher education that underlies all the comments that will flow forth from the great and good.

    My concerns that commentators will rubbish the results again, as they do when any increase in pass rates are announced.  The requirements of any qualification change with time.  It does not mean it gets easier – it can, but there is no evidence that it actually has.  But there is evidence it has changed in another way.

    Change in the the topics covered by exams have always happened.  How many doing Maths now would be able to handle a slide rule?  In my day, it was part of the exam.  Now students would no know what a slide rule was.

    For all those who are tempted to suggest the utter nonsense of advising students not to go to further Education but study things that industry bosses want now, could I enter the thought that we are really teaching people for occupations in technologies and systems that have not even been invented yet.  Such is the challenge of the future.

    Congratulations to all students in your results.  I just hope that the generation currently making decisions about your futures, your higher education places and the very sustainability of the Country, will not indulge in the short term thinking of ‘government spending’.  I hope they will have the courage for the investment in peoples’ futures and not our selfish present.

  • RSSArchive for Paul's Blog »