• Johnston backs praises response of Lib Dem MEP Watson August 31, 2010
    Paul Johnston, a leading Aberdeenshire Councillor has welcomed the link between the Pakistan floods to climate change and the need for the UK to tackle it in a more co-ordinated manner. “In much of the coverage of the tragedy that is Pakistan at the moment it is hard to make the connection to the UK.  Its […]
------News-------

Watchdog warns power shortages could hit UK

By Ryan Crighton Press and Journal
Published: 04/02/2010

The UK Government has been warned it will have to rely on Scotland to “keep the lights on” after its energy regulator said power shortages could hit Britain within three years.

Ofgem has revealed £200billion of investment is needed to guarantee supply over the next two decades because of diminishing gas supplies, rising international tensions, and crumbling infrastructure.

In a report out yesterday it raised the prospect of a return to the pre-Thatcher era of publicly controlled electricity and gas boards.

The watchdog said failure to reform the energy system could mean power shortages after 2015, while inaction would lead to a “degree of crisis” in three or four years.

It has predicted average household bills could jump as much as 25% and lists five possible solutions to the problem – the most drastic being the creation of a body like the old Central Electricity Generating Board that would set the amount and type of new power generation required.

The report omitted any final recommendations regarding locational charges, which have meant wind, wave and tidal power companies in the north and north-east being charged more to transmit electricity to the national grid than their English counterparts

SNP energy spokesman at Westminster, Mike Weir MP, said last night the report missed the point.

He said: “It’s rather strange that – 20 years after the break-up and privatisation of the energy companies – Ofgem are proposing a return to centralisation as a way of solving the problems the energy industry faces today.

“Scotland’s renewable energy potential is 10 times our actual need – a resource the UK will undoubtedly have to rely on to keep the lights on.

“The current transmission regime was developed for a grid where the power came from big coal, gas and nuclear stations which were often nearer the centres of population.

“It is not fit for a new century of energy production. Instead of glossing over this massive problem, Ofgem should be addressing it as a priority.”
Uncomfortable

Ofgem said staying with the current market model was “not an option” as power supplies strain under the pressure of the financial crisis, environmental targets, dependency on imported gas and the closure of ageing power stations.

Chief executive Alistair Buchanan said without reform the situation could become “quite uncomfortable” and customers would end up footing the bill for costly short-term solutions.

The government has indicated it will consider the report in its proposals for energy to 2050, due at the time of the Budget.

But Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband said it was confident of meeting energy supply needs, with a low-carbon transition plan delivering secure supplies until 2020.

Ian Parrett, of energy consultant Inenco, warned Britain had already left it too late to bridge the gap between older power stations going off-line and the emergence of new supplies “without making painful choices”.

Read more: http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1591442?UserKey=#ixzz0eZoo9Bmu

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Paul's Blog

  • Exams and Scottish Higher Education
    August 5, 2010 | 7:21 pm

    On the day that Scottish Exam results drop through the letterboxes of expecting students, there remains the unresolved debate about the future of higher education that underlies all the comments that will flow forth from the great and good.

    My concerns that commentators will rubbish the results again, as they do when any increase in pass rates are announced.  The requirements of any qualification change with time.  It does not mean it gets easier – it can, but there is no evidence that it actually has.  But there is evidence it has changed in another way.

    Change in the the topics covered by exams have always happened.  How many doing Maths now would be able to handle a slide rule?  In my day, it was part of the exam.  Now students would no know what a slide rule was.

    For all those who are tempted to suggest the utter nonsense of advising students not to go to further Education but study things that industry bosses want now, could I enter the thought that we are really teaching people for occupations in technologies and systems that have not even been invented yet.  Such is the challenge of the future.

    Congratulations to all students in your results.  I just hope that the generation currently making decisions about your futures, your higher education places and the very sustainability of the Country, will not indulge in the short term thinking of ‘government spending’.  I hope they will have the courage for the investment in peoples’ futures and not our selfish present.

  • RSSArchive for Paul's Blog »