• Johnston backs praises response of Lib Dem MEP Watson August 31, 2010
    Paul Johnston, a leading Aberdeenshire Councillor has welcomed the link between the Pakistan floods to climate change and the need for the UK to tackle it in a more co-ordinated manner. “In much of the coverage of the tragedy that is Pakistan at the moment it is hard to make the connection to the UK.  Its […]
------News-------

Rail results prove the point.

The Press and Journal today had the story of the increase in rail passengers in and around Aberdeen. The success is down to the reality of travel. Its frankly better travelling by train than sitting in a car. The idea that one should then turn to NESTRANS to have this debated suggests its role is somehow positive. Well that’s not certain.

NESTRANS is a body that now sits in the way of discussion – its narrow political leadership now dictate the two Council’s policies about travel and transport. Aberdeenshire Councillors have failed to back Crossrail because NESTRANS have failed to stick up for Crossrail.

If NESTRANS is to redeem itself as actually being a body that carries out the wishes of an electorate rather than one which filters out any democratic or environmental demands, then they should take the figures and properly get to work making Crossrail a reality. More stations, better trains, improved track will – as the current figures demonstrate – will attract more passengers and therefore improve carbon emissions and reduce congestion.

All of this would be preferable to be done before construction of the Western Peripheral Car Park, because that is what it will be without the integrated Transport Strategy needed for the City and Shire.  The WPR is only of benefit if it does not grow traffic but creates improved environments along with other schemes.  Having a WPR and nothing else of note will be the worst of all worlds.

After restoring Crossrail and an Integrated Transport Strategy, perhaps they could think again on the East Coast mainline – point out to some of the Councillors who think it goes via Perth, that it is via Fife – and see if electrification and capacity can be improved.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Paul's Blog

  • Exams and Scottish Higher Education
    August 5, 2010 | 7:21 pm

    On the day that Scottish Exam results drop through the letterboxes of expecting students, there remains the unresolved debate about the future of higher education that underlies all the comments that will flow forth from the great and good.

    My concerns that commentators will rubbish the results again, as they do when any increase in pass rates are announced.  The requirements of any qualification change with time.  It does not mean it gets easier – it can, but there is no evidence that it actually has.  But there is evidence it has changed in another way.

    Change in the the topics covered by exams have always happened.  How many doing Maths now would be able to handle a slide rule?  In my day, it was part of the exam.  Now students would no know what a slide rule was.

    For all those who are tempted to suggest the utter nonsense of advising students not to go to further Education but study things that industry bosses want now, could I enter the thought that we are really teaching people for occupations in technologies and systems that have not even been invented yet.  Such is the challenge of the future.

    Congratulations to all students in your results.  I just hope that the generation currently making decisions about your futures, your higher education places and the very sustainability of the Country, will not indulge in the short term thinking of ‘government spending’.  I hope they will have the courage for the investment in peoples’ futures and not our selfish present.

  • RSSArchive for Paul's Blog »